InBrief

SEARCH ALL POSTS

Recent case relating to whether ‘Chorley exception’ applies to barrister

Thu Jul 19 2018

A recent judgment was handed down by the New South Wales Court of Appeal on 13 July 2018 relating to whether the ‘Chorley exception’ applies to barristers.

There is an established rule that a self-represented litigant is not entitled to professional costs for acting for herself or himself in legal proceedings, however, there is a recognised exception that applies where the self-represented litigant is a solicitor (Chorley; Cachia v Hanes (1994) 179 CLR 403). The Court found that the ‘Chorley exception’ extends to barristers who are self-represented.

The judgment can be accessed here.

Contact InBriefReturn

If you no longer wish to receive In Brief, please notify the Bar Association's Certification Officer

InBrief welcomes advertisements relating to products, events or services, which assist barristers with their practice or support the objects of the Bar Association. Each day, a selection of InBrief articles is emailed to our members. To have an advertisement included a daily email broadcast costs $50 (inc. GST). Announcements must be paid in advance. For more information about the terms and conditions, or to arrange payment, please contact the Bar Association’s publications manager