InBrief

SEARCH ALL POSTS

Director of Public Prosecutions Reference No 1 of 2017 [2019] HCA 9

Thu Mar 21 2019

The High Court has held that a trial judge may not direct a jury in a criminal trial that it is open at any time after the close of the prosecution case to acquit the accused if the jury consider the evidence is insufficient to support a conviction. Such a direction, commonly referred to as a “Prasad direction”, is not permissible under the common law of Australia.

Further, the Court held that the common law of Australia does not recognise that the jury empanelled to try a criminal case on indictment have a right to return a verdict of not guilty of their own motion at any time after the close of the prosecution case.

Contact InBriefReturn

If you no longer wish to receive In Brief, please notify the Bar Association's Certification Officer

InBrief welcomes advertisements relating to products, events or services, which assist barristers with their practice or support the objects of the Bar Association. Each day, a selection of InBrief articles is emailed to our members. To have an advertisement included a daily email broadcast costs $50 (inc. GST). Announcements must be paid in advance. For more information about the terms and conditions, or to arrange payment, please contact the Bar Association’s publications manager