InBrief

SEARCH ALL POSTS

10th Annual Special Celebratory Practical Insolvency Conference (ADVERTISEMENT)

Mon Mar 21 2011 15:27:53

It's a high-calibre insolvency conference with over 400 solicitors, accounting and banking clients. Traill’s 10th Anniversary Practical Insolvency Conference will be held on 28–29 March 2011, Dockside, Cockle Bay, Sydney. Bar Association Members can claim up to 6CPD points. New registrations from Bar Association members receive $100 off the full conference rate. For details on how to claim your discount and registration contact Rosie Traill on 02 9449 8919 or 0405 136 001.�www.traillassociates.com.au or rtraill@traillassociates.com.au

Chaired by Richard Fisher AM, with: Ross Griffiths, Chief Credit Officer, Commonwealth Bank Gwyn Morgan, Westpac Institutional Bank Rick Drury, National Australia Bank Philip Crutchfield SC Robert Newlinds SC Ross Burns, ATO Denise North, CEO, IPA Dominic Emmett, Corrs Chambers Westgarth John Nestel, Freehills Phil Stern, Addisons Lawyers Clint Hinchen, Allens Arthur Robinson Mark Chapple, Baker & McKenzie Philip Hoser, Jones Day Scott Hedge, Kemp Strang Simon Lynch Allens Arthur Robinson Sally Nash, Sally Nash & Co Lawyers Brendon Watkins, Minter Ellison

Topics: ATO Initiatives State Of The Market Distressed Debt Trading Practitioner Regulation Duties When Selling Assets 
Retention Of Title & Personal Property Securities Reservation Of Rights ‘Hold Strategies’ Managed Investment Schemes Trusts And Powers Of Sale Applications To The Court For Directions Taking Action Against Valuers Validity Of Appointment Of Administrators – And Cost Implications For Practitioners Pre-Packs �� � Director’s Duties In Group Companies It will be worthwhile use of your time and provide clever networking opportunities. � � Gala Dinner, (Monday 28 March) attracts over 400.

Sponsored by Commonwealth Bank, PKF, Corrs Chambers Westgarth, IMF, Freehills & PPB Advisory.�

21 March 2011

Vietnam Family Law Conference 13 – 15 September 2011 (ADVERTISEMENT)

Tue Nov 09 2010 14:02:03

Join Legalwise Seminars in Hanoi in an atmosphere of cultural and legal exchange focussing on the issues in family law that are important to you. Plus, explore the implications of cross-cultural issues on your clients and your practice. For three days you will hear from an eminent panel of speakers including members of the judiciary, senior members of the profession and other professionals involved in family law all discussing all while enjoying the sights and sounds of Vietnam.

For conference information and registration form click here.

Download a draft speakers programme.

For more information call Jacquelyn Simon (02) 9387 8133 or e-mail jsimon@legalwiseseminars.com.au

31 March 2011

Tonight: constitutional law seminar on separation of powers

Thu Oct 14 2010 13:30:38

Associate Professor James Stellios (Australian National University) will present a paper on "A Rethinking of the Separation of Powers" at a seminar hosted tonight by the Australian Association of Constitutional Law.

The strict separation of Commonwealth judicial power from other forms of government power is a long established principle in Australian constitutional law. Its continued recognition poses challenges for the design of government institutions and the conferral of powers on them. Since the Australian judiciary is an integrated one, this has implications not just for courts at the federal level, but also for courts at the state and territory level. This paper will explore some of the implications for the judicial role at all levels of government and consider whether we should continue to recognise the principle in its current form.

Commentators: Sir Anthony Mason AC KBE QC and Mr RJ Ellicott QC

Chair: The Hon JJ Spigelman AC, Chief Justice of New South Wales

Venue: Court 18B, Federal Court, Queens Square, Sydney at 5.30 pm

The event is for members of AACL only. Membership is $50 per annum and entitles members to attend about five seminars a year at no additional cost. Membership enquiries may be made with Christos Mantziaris, 6th Floor St James Hall (mantziaris@stjames.net.au)

20 October 2010

Legally Coerced Treatment for Heroin Addicted Offenders: Ethical and Policy Issues

Tue Jun 29 2010 13:46:37

The New South Wales Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research will host a seminar by Professor Wayne Hall on� Legally Coerced Treatment for Heroin Addicted Offenders: Ethical and Policy Issues at the Metcalfe Auditorium, State Library of NSW between 10.00-11.00am on Wednesday, 14 July 2010.

Wayne Hall is an NHMRC Australia Fellow in addiction neuroethics at the University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research. He was formerly:� Professor of Public Health Policy in the School of Population Health� (2005-2010) and Director of the Office of Public Policy and Ethics at the Institute for Molecular Bioscience (2001-2005) at the University of Queensland; and Director of the National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre at UNSW (1994-2001).� He has advised the World Health Organization on: the health effects of cannabis use; the effectiveness of drug substitution treatment; the scientific quality of the Swiss heroin trials; the contribution of illicit drug use to the global burden of disease; and the ethical implications of genetic and neuroscience� research on addiction. In 2001 he was identified by the Institute for Scientific Analysis as one of the world’s most highly cited social scientists in the past 20 years. He was awarded an NHMRC Australia Fellowship in 2009 to research the public health, social policy and ethical implications of genetic and neuroscience research on drug use and addiction.

Legally coerced addiction treatment is provided as an alternative to imprisonment for persons who have been charged with or convicted of an offence to which their drug dependence has contributed e.g. drug distribution or property offences committed to fund their drug use. This paper, conducted in collaboration with Dr Jayne Lucke from the University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, outlines the case for providing such treatment, describes the various ways in which such treatment can be provided at different stages in the criminal justice system; discusses the ethical issues raised by using different degrees of legal coercion and different types of addiction treatment (e.g. drug free TCs and opioid maintenance treatment); and briefly reviews the evidence on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of this approach to treating addicted offenders. In the light of this evidence, the paper considers the evidence base for and policy issues raised by New South Wales Compulsory Drug Treatment Program. �

RSVPs are essential for catering purposes. Please e-mail to bocsar_seminars@agd.nsw.gov.au or ring 02 9231 9190.

7 July 2010

TONIGHT - Second Seminar on Kirk v Industrial Relations Commission of NSW

Thu May 27 2010 14:36:32

Tonight the Administrative Law and Constitutional Law Section will present a CPD seminar on the impact of the High Court judgment in Kirk v Industrial Relations Commission of NSW (2010) 239 CLR 531. This evening's seminar will emphasise the implications of Kirk for the judicial review of inferior court/tribunal decisions.Click here to download a flyer for this event.

2 June 2010

CPD seminars on Kirk v Industrial Relations Commission of NSW

Wed May 19 2010 14:41:13

There will be two CPD seminars to discuss the impact of the High Court judgment in Kirk v Industrial Relations Commission of NSW & Anor (2010) 84 ALJR 154. On 31 May the Industrial Law Section will address, in particular, the decision's significance for occupational health and safety prosecutions in NSW and judicial review by the NSW Court of Appeal of decisions by the Industrial Court / Industrial Relations Commission and other inferior courts. On 2 June the Administrative Law and Constitutional Law Section will emphasise the implications of Kirk for the judicial review of inferior court/tribunal decisions.�

�19 May 2010

ALRC inquiry into discovery in federal courts

Mon May 10 2010 15:12:31

The Australian Law Reform Commission will inquire into the law, practice and management of the discovery of documents in litigation before federal courts. Attorney-General Robert McClelland today released the terms of reference for the inquiry. The commission will examine: alternatives to discovery; the role of courts in managing discovery; and implications of the cost of discovery on the conduct of litigation, including means to limit the extent to which discovery gives rise to satellite litigation and the use of discovery for strategic purposes. The commission will provide its final report to the attorney-general by 31 March 2011.

10 May 2010

Chief Justice French delivers The State of the Judicature Address

Fri Sep 18 2009 09:24:36

Chief Justice Robert French has delivered his address on The State of the Australian Judicature at the 36th Australian Legal Convention today, in Perth. The chief justice spoke about a conception of a national judiciary and a common law of the Commonwealth. He observed that:

The Australian courts, Federal, State and Territory, which administer justice according to that one system of jurisprudence, reflect the federal character of our constitutional arrangements in their geographical locations and jurisdictions, and have continued to do so despite powerful arguments for their rationalisation and unification. ... Many proposals for rationalisation of the judicial system have followed over the years .� None have come to fruition in any formal sense.� Nevertheless, there is today a substantial amount of personal and institutional interaction and even exchange between judges and their courts across Australia.� ... Broadly what has happened is the growth of a kind of extra-institutional judicial community and an institutional convergence supported by the activities to which I have referred.� It is also supported by principles emanating from the High Court in relation to the unity of Australian law, the integration of our judicial institutions and the implications of those things for mutual respect and recognition accorded to decisions of courts across national, state and territory jurisdictions.

18 September 2009

Renovations at Queens Square and Court of Appeal lists of authorities

Thu Sep 10 2009 11:52:39

The president of the Court of Appeal has advised the Bar Association that the Supreme Court building will be undergoing renovations from late September 2009. The renovations will commence with Level 12 of the Supreme Court building, which includes both the President’s Court and Court 12, where a number of Court of Appeal hearings are held. During the renovation period the Court of Appeal will be using the Old Banco Court located in the St James Court complex. This arrangement has a number of implications for the way authorities are used in Court of Appeal hearings.

The court has requested that, due to the limited space in the Old Banco Court, lists of authorities will need to be strictly limited to ten copies of CLR and NSWLRs.

All other cases will have to be provided in copy form by the parties. These should be attached to the list of authorities, or brought to court if that is more convenient. Please be aware that the court staff will not print out cases for use in court. Judges will not have access to any material which is not provided to the court.

The submissions box for lists of authorities will be moved to Level 11. Lists of authorities will still be due 24 hours prior to the hearing (in most cases 10am on the business day prior to the hearing).

On time lodgement of lists of authorities remains important.

These changes will need to be implemented from Monday 28 September 2009.

The court has emphasised that these are temporary arrangements which are necessary to deal with practical issues arising from the renovations.

The court has requested the assistance of all members of the New South Wales Bar in complying with these requests.

Due to the interim nature of the changes, the current version of the Court of Appeal Practice note will remain unchanged.

21 September 2009

AIJA Conference on adversarial justice

Thu Aug 06 2009 10:17:51

The Australasian Institute of Judicial Administration and Monash University Faculty of Law are calling for papers to present at the conference on Non‐Adversarial Justice: Implications for the Legal System and Society, to be held on 4-7 May 2010 at the Hilton on the Park, East Melbourne. Closing date for papers is 4 December 2009. Learn more>

7 August 2009

Australian Government tables Hague Convention on service of documents

Fri Jun 26 2009 06:14:22

Attorney-General Robert McClelland has announced the tabling in parliament of the Hague Convention on Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil and Commercial Matters 1965. The Treaties Committee is seeking submissions on the implications for Australia of acceding to the convention. Submissions are requested by Friday 24 July 2009. For more information visit the committee's web site or e-mail jsct@aph.gov.au or phone (02) 6277 4002.

26 June 2009

Bar Council business for April-May 2009

Thu Jun 18 2009 10:56:22

Matters reported elsewhere in In Brief are omitted from this summary of Bar Council business. Bar Council regularly considers requests by the attorney general, the courts and other agencies for advice on proposed legislation. Because that advice is sought on a confidential basis, it is not noted in this summary. Any member interested in a particular matter should contact the executive director for further information.

President’s report

The president advised that in the past few weeks she had attended a number of meetings and functions representing the Bar Association.

7 April 2009: the 2009 Sir Maurice Byers Lecture, ‘Beyond the text: A vision of the structure and function of the Constitution’, by Stephen Gageler SC.

8 April 2009: the president and the executive director had met with Attorney-General Robert McClelland. Matters discussed included judicial resources available to the Federal Court and Family Court in Sydney; the national consultation being undertaken on a charter of rights and the repeal of section 55D of the Judiciary Act 1903.

14 April 2009: the president attended the swearing-in ceremony at the District Court for Andrew Colefax SC and former Deputy Chief Magistrate Helen Syme. The attorney general addressed the court on behalf of the bar.

30 April 2009: official opening of the new Sydney Law School Building

1 May 2009: the swearing-in of the Hon Justice Rachel Pepper of the Land and Environment Court at which she spoke on behalf of the bar.

4 May 2009: the ‘opening’ of the current of Bar Practice Course

8 May 2009: Bench and Bar Dinner: the president noted the success of the Bench and Bar Dinner held on the evening of Friday, 8 May 2009. She thanked Anne Horvath and Philip Boulten SC for their contributions to the success of the evening. The president is writing to the chief justice thanking him both for attending and speaking at the dinner. �

9 May 2009:� meeting of the Council of the Australian Bar Association

11 May 2009: the president delivered the occasional address at a graduation ceremony of law, commerce and arts students at the University of NSW.

A charter of rights

The president advised that on 22 April Bret Walker SC and Simeon Beckett had attended a meeting convened by the Human Rights Commission to discuss the constitutional implications of an Australian human Rights Act. The unanimous view of the meeting was that a Human Rights Act can be drafted that would be constitutionally valid. The information gained at that meeting would be of assistance to the Human Rights Committee in its drafting of the association’s submission to the National Human Rights Consultation Committee.

Barristers in schools programme

The president advised that during Law Week (10 - 15 May) Year 5 and 6 students from four schools were participating in the Barristers in Schools Programme: Penrith; Summer Hill; Newbridge Heights and Newtown North public schools.� The exercise with Newtown North Public School was to be conducted in the court room at the Police and Justice Museum with the children appearing in the mock trial with wigs and gowns.

The president had attended the Summer Hill School activity on 12 May.� The Daily Telegraph had given positive coverage to this event.

The children have been enthusiastic participants and the feed back from the schools and the Department of Education and training has been excellent.� The president thanked members of the Working Party on the Bar in the Community, and in particular Karen Conte-Mills, Margaret Cunneen SC and Andrew Martin for preparing the curriculum and conducting the programme.

Local Court liaison person

The president advised that the chief magistrate had recently asked for nominees for several working parties being restructured by the court. She was keen to ensure that the association’s representatives on court liaison bodies practice predominantly in that court.� Lester Fernandez of Forbes Chambers had been appointed the Local Court liaison person. �

The president and the Bar Council expressed their appreciation for the many years' efforts by Traill in her role as the Local Court liaison person.

Renewal of practising certificates and association membership

The executive director advised that earlier in the day renewal documentation for practising certificate and membership had been posted to all members of the bar. It had not been possible to issue the documentation earlier because of difficulties in settling with the insurers the wording of the various policies. Unfortunately, it appeared likely that the PII premiums will increase significantly.� �

National Legal Profession Reform

The executive director advised that the Council of Australian Governments (COAG) had agreed the draft legislation providing uniform laws regulating the legal profession across Australia be prepared for consideration by COAG within 12 months. A taskforce had been appointed by the attorney-general to make recommendation and prepare the draft legislation. The attorney-general would be appointing a consultative group to assist the taskforce. �

Judiciary Act 1903

The executive director advised that the Australian Government had now responded to representations from the Bar Association and had included a clause in Law and Justice Legislation Amendment (Identity Crimes and other Measures) Bill 2008 to repeal s 5DD of the Judiciary Act 1903, which allowed persons on a roll of legal practitioners to appear in territory courts, including the High Court of Australia, even though they did not hold a current practicing certificate. This anomaly had arisen because this section of the Judiciary Act had not been amended since the introduction of practicing certificates many years ago. �

Renewal of practicing certificate and professional indemnity insurance policies

The executive director advised that a submission seeking the attorney general’s approval to the 2009/10 practicing certificate fees and the professional indemnity insurance policies being offered by four insurers/brokers were with the attorney general for his approval.

Election of new secretary

Rachel Pepper formally resigned as secretary of the Bar Association and as a director of the Bar Association. Paresh Khandhar was unanimously elected as the new secretary of the Bar Association.

Silk Selection Committee and information session on silk application process

The Bar Council endorsed the president’s recommendation that the 2009 Senior Counsel Selection Committee members be the president, senior vice-president, Anthony Bannon SC, John Griffiths SC and Geoffrey Bellew SC .

Amendment of the Constitution of the New South Wales Bar Association

The Bar Council approved in principal the proposed amendments to the Constitution of the New South Wales Bar Association, other than the proposal to reduce the number of members required to form a quorum at a general meeting from 25 to five.�

The Bar Council asked that a revised version of the proposed new Constitution be bought back to a future meeting of the council, together with the proposed motions to be moved at a general meeting seeking approval to the amendments.� The council indicated that it� was inclined to put the new constitution before the Annual General Meeting to be held in November.

Delegation to and appointment as authorised persons

Bar Council resolved to delegate pursuant to s 696(2) of the Legal Profession Act 2004 to the Jennifer Pearce, director, professional conduct and Emma Day, deputy director, professional conduct the powers and functions of the Bar Council to issue notices which may or are required to be issued under the Legal Profession Act 2004.

It was further resolved to appoint pursuant to s 531A of the Legal Profession Act 2004, Jennifer Pearce and Emma Day to be authorised persons for the purposes of Part 4.4 of the Legal Profession Act 2004 but only for the purpose of exercising powers under Part 6.2 of the Legal Profession Act 2004.

Ms Rachel Pepper

The Bar Council noted with regret that this was the last meeting of the council that would be attended by Rachel Pepper.� Pepper had been a member of the council since 2001 and secretary since 2007. The president advised that Pepper had agreed to remain on the Equal Opportunity Committee, the work of which she has given considerable time and effort. �

The Bar Council gave Pepper a vote of thanks for her dedication to the work of the Bar Council, the Bar Association and more generally to the community, and to the rule of law in Fiji. She will be a considerable loss to the Bar Council.� The Bar Council’s loss will be the Land and Environment Court’s gain.

New bar councillor

The president welcomed Dominic Toomey to the Bar Council, replacing Rachel Pepper on her appointment to the Land and Environment Court.

Should details of reprimands be published by the Bar Association?

The Bar Council was inclined to the publication of reprimands on the Bar Association’s website, but not necessarily in the same form as appears on the legal services commissioner’s website. Further, the council wished to consider the question of the duration of the publication. The director, professional conduct was asked to prepare a memorandum on these matters for discussion at a future meeting of the council.

Approval of the proposed fee regime for practicing certificate fees for barristers for the year commencing 1 July 2009

The Bar Council noted the attorney general’s approval for a 3.8 per cent increase in practising certificate fees for 2009- 2010. The Bar Council also noted the attorney general’s approval of the regulatory/public interest and regulatory activities analysis that had been undertaken by the association. The Bar Council expressed its thanks to the executive director and his staff for the large amount of work that had been undertaken in the preparation of this analysis.

18 June 2009

Commercial Law Association seminars in May-June

Wed Apr 15 2009 13:41:00

The Commercial Law Association has announced a series of seminars in May-June 2009. For more information regarding any or all of the following seminars, or to register online, visit the CLA web site.

Affordable Aged Care: Current issues, innovative solutions and the role of insurance 1.30 pm -4.30 pm Thursday 7 May, Gadens, Level 16 Skygarden, 77 Castlereagh Street, Sydney

•��� Legal issues concerning elder law and advance care planning, •��� Financial and healthcare issues. Options for insurers and legal practitioners. •��� Regulatory regimes on powers of attorney and guardianship laws, Current problems. •��� Real cost of living in Retirement and Nursing Homes. •��� Funding care into the future. Potential role for new insurance products. •��� US and European experience – long care models •��� Legal framework for insurance products. •��� Case studies

Hon Justine Elliott, Minister for Aging, Federal Government The Hon. John Watkins, CEO of Alzheimer’s Australia NSW and former NSW� Deputy Premier

Associate Professor Cameron Stewart Cameron Stewart is an Associate Professor in Law at Sydney Law School and Associate Professor at the Centre for Values, Ethics and the Law in Medicine at the University of Sydney.

Arthur Koumoukelis Arthur is the gadens lawyers Sydney office partner in charge of Aged Care and Retirement Villages.�

John Walker John Walker is a Financial Adviser with RetireInvest and has worked in the financial services industry since 1984, spending all that time as a financial planner.

Harry Stout CEO ING Australia

Ray Giblett Ray Giblett is a Partner, Corporate Risk and Insurance, Gadens

Registration CLA members $275 Non members $335

Hot issues in Corporations Law 9.15 am -12.30 pm Friday 8 May 2009 Dixson Room, NSW State Library, Macquarie Street, Sydney

•��� The buck stops where ?:current developments in senior executive remuneration� •��� Disclosure and communication with shareholders and other stakeholders •��� Legal and governance developments, including the Rudd government proposals, APRA guidelines and Views of key governance bodies and proxy advisers •��� Current trends in remuneration structuring for CEOs and senior executives •��� Access to the company’s books. Who when and how. Statutory and general law rights. •��� Voluntary Administration Schemes. Recent issues. Case studies •��� Shareholder claims against insolvent companies

Warwick S Johnson (Chair) Former Barrister and Company Director

Presenters, Carolyn Pugsley, Senior Associate, Head Office Advisory Team, Freehills Dr Christos Mantziaris, Eigth Floor Selborne Chambers, Stephen Mullette,� Executive Lawyer,� Commercial Litigation, Insolvency and Finance Recoveries Bartier Perry, Greg Wrobel, Partmer, Holding Redlich Lawyers

Disclosure - oil on turbulent financial waters?

Friday 8 May 1.30 pm -5.00 pm Dixson Room, NSW State Library, Macquarie Street Sydney.

Recent ASIC initiatives for improving disclosure for retails investors in debentures and unlisted mortgage and property trusts. Keeping investors informed Superannuation Disclosure Effective communication: Clear concise and effective disclosure How to keep advertising out of court Disclosure of fees in Pdfs Performance fees

Jenny Wily, Wily Legal and Consulting Pty Limited Michael Vrisakis, Partner Freehills Claire Wivell Plater, Director Gold Seal Lynne Peach, Partner, Minter Ellison Scott Charaneka, Partner

Free seminar – Self Managed Super Funds Monday 10 May Graeme Colley, ING John Walker, RetireInvest RetireInvest boardroom, level 8, 10 Barrack Street, Sydney International Seminar –Outward Investment case study into Asia Wednesday 27 May at 4.30 pm -6.00 pm, Corrs Chambers Westgarth, level 32 Governor Phillip tower, Farrer Place, Sydney

Andrew Percival MC will take an expert panel through an outward investment scenario in relation to an Australian entity looking at offshoring options in Asia (China, Taiwan, Vietnam, Thailand, etc).� The format of the event is designed to encourage audience interaction with significant opportunity after the case study for Q&A and networking.

Recent developments in Trade Practices Parts 4 & 5

Friday 19 June, 9.15 am 12.30 pm, Dixson Room NSW State Library

Section 46 - Misuse of Market Power. The commercial implications fo the ‘Birdsville Amendments’. (Amendment Bill 2008) Bill Reid, Partner Blake Dawson

Section 52. Matters of Liability. Interface between liability and exclusion clauses. Case studies. Christopher Hodgekiss SC The Franchising Code of Conduct. Interface Section 52 and the Franchise Code. Fiona Wallwork, Partner, Deacons

Cartels Brent Fisse.

Director’s duties in trying times. The ‘ins but not outs’ for directors in the current economic climate

Friday 19 June, 1.30 pm -4.45 pm Friday 19 June, Dixson Room, NSW State Library

Insurance & indemnities Louise Cantrill, Special Counsel, Risk Insurance Group HDY Independent advice Jason Munstermann, Partner Commercial Disputes, HDY, Insolvency, directors' & officers' duties and exposures during times of financial distress Alex Smith, Senior Associate, Banking Restructuring & Insolvency, HDY

In the spotlight - current issues and recent cases, trends in shareholder claims and class actions and what might be expected in the near future recent consideration of directors' & officers' defences to allegations of breach of duty

Kathy Merrick, Partner, Commercial Disputes Group HDY, Kerry Abadee, Senior Associate, Commercial Disputes, HDY Current Issues in Insolvency Conference 9.30 am -5.00 pm Friday 31 July, Dixson Room, NSW State Library, Macquarie Street,�

Opening: Justice Austin ��� Session 1 Chair & Commentator: Richard Fisher AM, General Counsel and Adjunct Professor, Graduate School of Government, University of Sydney��� ��� Paper 1: Corporate benefit, directors’ duties and voidable transactions after Bell v Westpac (2008) WASC 239��� Speaker: Associate Professor Lee Aitken, Hong Kong University ��� ��� Session 2��� ��� ��� Chair: Mark Robinson, Partner PPB Paper 2: ��� UNCITRAL model law��� Speaker:��� Scott Atkins, Partner, Commentator John Martin, Partner Henry Davis York Paper 3:��� The duties of receivers and managers Speaker:��� Richard Fisher AM ��� ��� Session 3��� Chair: Ian Ferrier AM, Chairman BRI Ferrier��� ��� Paper 4: ��� Hall v Poolman: Why directors need to fear liquidators for Insolvent Trading Liquidators can bring proceedings although they may result in little return for unsecured creditors Liquidators don not normally need Court leave to enter into litigation funding agreements Public interest in liquidators pursuing directors for insolvent trading Speaker:��� Michael Quinlan, Partner Allens Arthur Robinson Paper 5:��� Recent cases: possibilities Ansett (set-off), inc tax, GST Speaker:��� Tony Ryan Partner Blake Dawson

Session 4��� Chair:� Joe , McGrath Nicol��� ��� Paper 6:��� Reform Issues: Sons of Gwalia, Chapter 11, Insolvent Trading Speaker:��� James Marshall, Partner Blake Dawson Paper 7:��� S 1323 Corporations Act issues Speaker:��� Leo Gor, Barrister, University Chambers Open forum and Closing Address: Justice Barrett

Journal of Equity and Commercial Law Association conference Equity and Financial Stress

Friday, 14 August 2009, 9.15 am-12.30 pm Dixson Room, NSW State Library

Chairs The Hon Justice Michael Kirby Professor Keith Mason The Hon Justice Kevin Lindgren The Hon Justice Margaret Stone ��� ��� ��� ��� Speakers Mark Leeming: The Fiduciary Obligation: Scope of Fiduciary Duty Professor Michael Bryan:� Undue Influence/Unconscionability and Third parties Dr Joshua Getzler: Fiduciary Investment and Duties of Care: Was Lord Eldon Right? Professor Peter Watts:� Constructive Trusts and Insolvency

15 April 2009

Bar Council business for Thursday, 1 May 2008

Mon Jun 02 2008 14:35:46

Matters reported elsewhere in In Brief are omitted from this summary of Bar Council business. Bar Council regularly considers requests by the attorney general, the courts and other agencies for advice on proposed legislation. Because that advice is sought on a confidential basis, it is not noted in this summary. Any member interested in a particular matter should contact either the relevant member of Bar Council or the executive director for further information.��

The president reported on some of her activities on behalf of the Bar Association that she had attended since the last business and policy meeting of the Bar Council.� She advised that a list of the other events would be provided in the minutes.

Meeting with Attorney General Hatzistergos

On Thursday 3 April the president, Odgers SC and the executive director met with the attorney general to discuss the Bar Association’s concerns with aspects of the proposed criminal case conferencing trial, for which the enabling legislation had been introduced into the Legislative Council the night before.

General Meeting of the Bar Association, 7 April

The president reported on the general meeting of the Bar Association that took place on Monday 7 April in the Common Room to discuss the proposed changes to the New South Wales Barristers’ Rules. She referred to the record of the meeting that was included in the agenda papers.� The president thanked those Bar councillors who had attended the meeting for doing so. The president noted that the attorney general attended at the latter part of the meeting and had answered questions from the floor. � Commonwealth Bank and equitable briefing

The president advised that on 10 April she, the executive director and project officer (secretariat and research) met with Richard Coleman, acting general counsel, Commonwealth Bank and bank solicitors Paul Smythies and Lee Anderson to discuss the bank adopting the model Equitable Briefing Policy.� After some discussion, the bank’s officers undertook to consider the policy and its implications for the bank. Subsequently Mr Smythies had advised the executive director that the bank would be adopting the Equitable Briefing Policy, and adding to its list of counsel to be briefed suitably qualified women barristers. Law firms the bank briefed would also be asked to adhere to the policy.

The executive director is separately discussing with Commonwealth Bank officers the bank providing loans at reasonable rates to junior barristers seeking to buy chambers.

Funeral for Peter McDowell and Memorial Service for Kim Santow

On Wednesday 23 April the president attended the funeral of Peter McDowell and in the evening, together with the treasurer and the executive director, the memorial service for the Hon Kim Santow AO held at the University of Sydney.� Both services were extremely well attended and were fitting tributes to both men.�

Maurice Byers Lecture

Dame Sian Elias, chief justice of New Zealand, had given the 2008 Maurice Byers Lecture on Thursday 24 April.� The president reported that, despite that being the evening before the ANZAC day long weekend, and raining, the event was well attended. Dame Elias’ very interesting address will be published in a future edition of Bar News.

City of Sydney Council

On Wednesday 30 April the president, executive director and project officer (secretariat and research) had met with Louise Byrne and Susan Teasey, solicitors with the City of Sydney Council, to discuss how the council might more easily brief the Bar. The possibility of the council adopting the model Equitable Briefing Policy was also discussed.

Other meetings/events

•�CPD mini conference, Orange, Saturday 28 March (with executive director) •�Inaugural Healthy Breakfast, Common Room, Friday 27 March. •�Lunch with chief magistrate and deputy chief magistrates Helen Syme and Paul Cloran (and executive director), Friday, 27 March. •�University of Sydney Jessup Moot Reception, Wednesday 2 April (with executive director). •�Opening of ‘Legal Chameleons’, an exhibition of photographs by Mark Tedeschi QC, Justice Museum, Thursday, 3 April (with executive director) •�Meeting with Rebecca Irwin, prime minister’s justice advisor, Wednesday 16 April (with director, law reform and public affairs).� Matters discussed included a possible Commonwealth Charter of Rights and the Commonwealth directly briefing the Bar.

Discussion paper on selection criteria for judicial appointments

The president referred to the NSW attorney general’s Discussion Paper on Selection Criteria for Judicial Appointments which the executive director had e-mailed to Bar councillors. Bathurst QC (chair), Pepper, Needham SC and Ash will prepare a report on the paper for consideration by the council at its meeting on 22 May.

Tabling of papers for Bar Council meetings

The president reminded Bar councillors of her memorandum of November 2007 which stated that ‘The agenda and papers for Bar Council meetings will be distributed on the Friday preceding the scheduled meeting.� Unless a matter is genuinely urgent (and some PCC matters will fall into this category), papers will not be added to the agenda after this time.’� She asked that if any councillor has a matter for Bar Council that it be submitted to the executive assistant by the Wednesday of the week prior to the meeting.

Bench and Bar Dinner

The executive director advised that some 640 guests would be attending the Bench and Bar Dinner.

Practising certificate and professional indemnity insurance renewals

The executive director advised that the attorney general had approved the practising certificate fees for 2008 – 2009. The attorney general’s approval to the four submitted PII policies was still being sought. The president was settling a detailed letter to go out with the renewal notices.

Letters to the editor

The executive director asked that members of the Bar Council advise him if they were successful in having a letter to the editor printed on matters of interest to the Bar Association.�

Treasurer’s report

The treasurer asked Bar Councillors to read his tabled report and apologised for it not being possible to circulate the report prior to the meeting.� He thanked the executive director and the finance manager for their assistance in briefing him on the current position of the Bar Association.�

The Bar Council agreed to refer the recommendations in the treasurer’s report to the Finance and Investment Committee (FIAC) for consideration.

NSW Barristers’ Rules, proposed amendments to 35 and 35A

The senior vice-president reported on the deliberations of the Rules Committee and their new proposal to amend Rule 35 and 35A of the New South Wales Barristers’ Rules.� He advised that the new proposal was a compromise, but one that the committee thought principled and justified.� He advised that the rule had been circulated to the Common Law Committee, Criminal Law Committee, Family Law Committee, director of public prosecutions and the crown prosecutors; the feedback had been very favourable.

The new proposal removes the suggested changes to rule 35 so that rule 35 would be unaltered from its present form and adds new rules 35A and 35B.

Rule 35A is directed solely to the cross-examination of complainants who make allegations of sexual assault, whether the proceedings are criminal or civil.� Rule 35B qualifies the operation of the rule and picks up the substance of s275A (3) of the Criminal Procedure Act and s41(3) of the Evidence Act (as amended).

The senior vice-president recommended that the Bar Council approve the circulation of the proposed new rule for consideration and comment.

Rule 35 No change to rule as presently drafted – last amended 1997. In other words “principally” retained in 35 (c) and the categories are not expanded.

35. A barrister must, when exercising the forensic judgments called for throughout the case, take care to ensure that decisions by the barrister or on the barrister's advice to invoke the coercive powers of a court or to make allegations or suggestions under privilege against any person:

(a) are reasonably justified by the material already available to the barrister;

(b) are appropriate for the robust advancement of the client's case on its merits;

(c) are not made principally in order to harass or embarrass the person; and

(d) are not made principally in order to gain some collateral advantage for the client or the barrister or the instructing solicitor out of court.

Proposed Rule 35A Without limiting the generality of Rule 35, in proceedings in which an allegation of sexual assault is made and in which the person who is alleged to have been assaulted gives evidence:

(a) A barrister must not ask that witness a question or pursue a line of questioning of that witness which is intended: (i) to mislead or confuse the witness; or (ii) to be unduly annoying, harassing, intimidating, offensive, oppressive, humiliating or repetitive.

(b) A barrister must take into account any particular vulnerability of the witness in the manner and tone of the questions he or she asks.

Proposed Rule 35B A barrister will not infringe Rule 35A merely because:

(a) the question or questioning challenges the truthfulness of the witness or the consistency or accuracy of any statements made by the witness, or

(b) the question or questioning requires the witness to give evidence that the witness could consider to be offensive, distasteful or private.

The Bar Council discussed the proposal and the possible courses of action.� It gave consideration to all the submissions that had been received concerning the rule and the remarks made at the general meeting of the Bar on 7 April.

The Bar Council agreed that the proposed new rule be circulated to the membership for consideration and comment by Friday, 16 May.� The note to the Bar would highlight the practice areas the change would cover and would ask for both supportive comments and/or possible changes.

The president agreed that a draft of the letter that would be sent to the attorney general when the new rule had been settled would be first circulated to the Bar Council.

The Bar Council recorded their thanks to the Rules Committee for the hard work they had put in over the past few weeks on this matter.

Silk Selection Committee and information session on silk application

The president spoke to her memorandum concerning membership of the Silk Selection Committee for 2008. She proposed that the members be the president, the senior vice-president, Tom Bathurst QC; Lindsay Foster SC; Paul Byrne SC and Stephen Gageler SC.

The president advised that she would be convening a seminar for potential applicants on Monday 30 June.

The Bar Council endorsed the membership of the Silk Selection Committee.

Academics - practising certificate condition

The Bar Council discussed the memorandum from the director, legal which sought a clarification of the meaning of ‘leader’ in relation to the condition currently placed on the practicing certificate of academics who have not completed the Bar Practice Course.

The Bar Council resolved that ‘leader’ be defined in the condition as a barrister who is a senior counsel or who has more than seven years experience and holds an unrestricted practising certificate.

The application of s50 of the Civil Liability Act 2002 (no recovery where person intoxicated) to children

The Bar Council resolved to request the Common Law Committee to draft a proposal for amendment to the Civil Liability Act to be referred to the attorney general for his consideration, together with a covering letter.

Appointment of the judiciary

The president raised the item regarding the attorney general’s query as to whether the Bar Association wished to have a representative on selection committees for appointments to the Local Court and the District Court.� The president noted that in the past there had been Bar Association representation on selection committees for public defenders and crown prosecutors.

The Bar Council agreed that the Bar Association should seek representation on selection committees for public defenders and crown prosecutors.

The Bar Council asked that the committee chaired by the senior vice-president that is preparing a report for the council on the NSW attorney general’s Discussion Paper on Selection Criteria for Judicial Appointments 2008 to also consider the question as to whether it would be appropriate for there to be Bar Association representation on the selection panels for members of the judiciary.

The Bar Council noted the minutes.

Submission to joint report of the Commonwealth, NSW and Victorian Law Reform Commissions, ALRC 102, Uniform Evidence Law

The Bar Council noted the memorandum from the executive director that outlined the process undertaken when the ALRC sought submissions for its ‘Uniform Evidence Law’ reference.

A query was raised as to whether the Commonwealth legislation now includes the equivalent of s41 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW).� The executive director was asked to advise the current position with the Commonwealth Act.

University of New South Wales mooting

The Bar Council noted that the UNSW’s mooting team had come second in the international round of the Jessup Moot Competition that had been held in Washington DC in mid April.

Family Provision Act 1982

Needham SC reported on the work undertaken by a working party comprising herself, Blackburn-Hart SC, Ellison SC and Wilson concerning the NSW attorney general’s draft consultation Family Provision Amendment Bill. The working party has been giving particular attention to the proposed cost restriction in s100 of the draft Bill, and is currently consulting with the Law Society and trustee companies in the course of finalising a draft submission for Bar Council consideration.

2 June 2008

Conference on private equity and the sub-prime crisis

Fri Feb 29 2008 12:17:36

Members are invited to attend�a joint Law Council - International Bar Association conference on�private equity and�the sub-prime crisis, which will take place from 7 - 8 April 2008 at the Intercontinental Hotel, Sydney, Australia.�Don't delay! The early bird registration period for this event has been extended to Monday 3rd March.

Topics will be drawn from a wide range of issues affecting industries represented by the Section including:

  • A review of the private equity phenomenon and the sub prime crisis;
  • the view from the Bench;
  • regional trends and implications for globalisation;
  • managing transitions in major corporate events;
  • the regulation of hedge funds; and�
  • a financing perspective on adverse marketing conditions on private equity deals.

View the conference information and registration brochure>

3 March�2008

A threat to privilege? The ALRC discussion paper

Fri Nov 16 2007 11:05:24

The ALRC (Australian Law Reform Commission) has been investigating the abrogation of legal professional privilege. Some of the draft proposals of the ALRC raise issues of concern in connection with the ongoing watering down of the privilege.

This seminar, to be presented by Cameron Moore and Dr Ruth Higgins, discusses those proposals, and the abrogation of privilege more generally, including the implications of creeping abrogation for the practice of law.

This seminar will take place next week, tomorrow, 22 November. For more information, download a flyer>

21�November 2007�

�

NSW Government reviews legislation to stop graffiti vandalism

Wed Sep 19 2007 09:33:42

The NSW Government is reviewing all legislation to stop graffiti vandalism, including consideration of a complete ban on the sale of aerosol paint.

The aim of the review is to determine:

  • whether the policy objectives of the legislation to reduce graffiti remain valid
  • whether the terms of the legislation remain appropriate for securing those objectives, and
  • the costs and benefits of the legislation.

The review will assess and examine the operation, effectiveness and implications of the following legislation:

  • Crimes Act 1900�
  • Summary Offences Act 1988
  • Local Government Act 1993�
  • Rail Safety (General) Regulation 2003
  • Children (Community Service Orders) Act 1987�
  • Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999�
  • Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999

The review will also assess and examine the feasibility, effectiveness and potential implications of a complete ban on the sale of aerosol paint in NSW, including its usage, points of purchase and any impacts on business and employment.

The NSW Attorney General’s Department invites interested individuals and organisations to make written submissions to the review.

Submissions should be sent to the manager, policy and analysis, Crime Prevention Division, NSW Attorney General’s Department, GPO Box 6, Sydney NSW 2001 or emailed to: graffiti_submissions@agd.nsw.gov.au.

The closing date for submissions is 31 October 2007.

19 September 2007